McDonnell v. City of Chicago
60 Ill. 350
This text of 60 Ill. 350 (McDonnell v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McDonnell v. City of Chicago, 60 Ill. 350 (Ill. 1871).
Opinion
The first section of the ordinance on which the assessment was based in this case, is as follows:
“That curb walls be and are hereby ordered constructed on Market street, from the north curb line of Randolph street to the south curb line of Lake street, and rebuilt and repaired in said portion of Market street, where the same are not now in a good and sound condition, and that said Market street, from the north line of Randolph street to the south line of Lake street, be and is hereby ordered filled and paved with wooden blocks. Said work to be done under the superintendency of the Board of Public AYorks, conformably to the drawings prepared by said Board, and hereto annexed.”
An ordinance similar to this was held, in Foss v. City of Chicago, 56 Ill. 354, to be void. So this must fall, for the same reasons given in that case. It is not distinguishable.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Foss v. City of Chicago
56 Ill. 354 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1870)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
60 Ill. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonnell-v-city-of-chicago-ill-1871.