McDonie v. Wallster
This text of 2024 Ohio 5265 (McDonie v. Wallster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as McDonie v. Wallster, 2024-Ohio-5265.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY
JOHN P. MCDONIE, CASE NO. 2024-L-068
Plaintiff-Appellant, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division HEATHER WALLSTER,
Defendant-Appellee. Trial Court No. 2021 CV 00966
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Decided: November 4, 2024 Judgment: Appeal dismissed
John P. McDonie, pro se, 1101 West Maple Street, North Canton, OH 44720 (Plaintiff- Appellant).
Pamela D. Kurt, Kurt Law Office, LLC, 30432 Euclid Avenue, Suite 116, Wickliffe, OH 44092 (For Defendant-Appellee).
EUGENE A. LUCCI, P.J.
{¶1} Appellant, John P. McDonie, filed a pro se appeal from a September 17,
2024 order, in which a magistrate from the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile
Division, denied appellant’s motion for ex parte relief. Appellee, Heather Wallster,
through counsel, moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final order.
{¶2} Since this court may entertain only those appeals from final judgments or
orders, we must determine whether there is a final appealable order. Noble v. Colwell,
44 Ohio St.3d 92, 96 (1989). Under Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution,
an appellate court can immediately review a trial court’s judgment only if it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Germ v. Fuerst, 2003-Ohio-6241, ¶ 3 (11th Dist.). If the lower
court’s order is not final, a reviewing court does not have jurisdiction to review the matter,
and the appeal must be dismissed. Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio
St.3d 17, 20 (1989).
{¶3} R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a “final order” and sets forth seven categories of
appealable judgments, and if the trial court’s judgment satisfies any of them, it will be
deemed a “final order” and can be immediately appealed and reviewed. Here, the
September 17, 2024 order on appeal does not fit within any of the categories for being a
final order pursuant to R.C. 2505.02(B) and did not dispose of all the claims.
{¶4} In general, magistrates may enter orders without judicial approval if
necessary to regulate the proceedings and if the order is not dispositive of a claim or
defense of a party. Bahner v. Marketplace Mall, LLC, 2024-Ohio-1430, ¶ 5 (11th Dist.);
See also Civ.R. 53(D)(2)(a)(i). This court has stated that although a magistrate’s order is
effective without judicial approval, it is not “directly appealable,” and thus is simply
interlocutory in nature. Bahner at ¶ 5.
{¶5} Here, the September 17, 2024 magistrate’s order is not a final appealable
order and is simply interlocutory. Therefore, this court does not have jurisdiction to hear
this appeal. However, nothing prevents appellant from obtaining effective relief through
an appeal once the trial court has entered a final judgment in the action.
{¶6} Based upon the foregoing analysis, appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby
granted. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for lack of a final appealable order.
JOHN J. EKLUND, J., ROBERT J. PATTON, J., concur. 2
Case No. 2024-L-068
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 Ohio 5265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonie-v-wallster-ohioctapp-2024.