McDonie v. Wallster

2024 Ohio 5265
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 4, 2024
Docket2024-L-068
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2024 Ohio 5265 (McDonie v. Wallster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonie v. Wallster, 2024 Ohio 5265 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

[Cite as McDonie v. Wallster, 2024-Ohio-5265.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY

JOHN P. MCDONIE, CASE NO. 2024-L-068

Plaintiff-Appellant, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division HEATHER WALLSTER,

Defendant-Appellee. Trial Court No. 2021 CV 00966

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Decided: November 4, 2024 Judgment: Appeal dismissed

John P. McDonie, pro se, 1101 West Maple Street, North Canton, OH 44720 (Plaintiff- Appellant).

Pamela D. Kurt, Kurt Law Office, LLC, 30432 Euclid Avenue, Suite 116, Wickliffe, OH 44092 (For Defendant-Appellee).

EUGENE A. LUCCI, P.J.

{¶1} Appellant, John P. McDonie, filed a pro se appeal from a September 17,

2024 order, in which a magistrate from the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile

Division, denied appellant’s motion for ex parte relief. Appellee, Heather Wallster,

through counsel, moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final order.

{¶2} Since this court may entertain only those appeals from final judgments or

orders, we must determine whether there is a final appealable order. Noble v. Colwell,

44 Ohio St.3d 92, 96 (1989). Under Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution,

an appellate court can immediately review a trial court’s judgment only if it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Germ v. Fuerst, 2003-Ohio-6241, ¶ 3 (11th Dist.). If the lower

court’s order is not final, a reviewing court does not have jurisdiction to review the matter,

and the appeal must be dismissed. Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio

St.3d 17, 20 (1989).

{¶3} R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a “final order” and sets forth seven categories of

appealable judgments, and if the trial court’s judgment satisfies any of them, it will be

deemed a “final order” and can be immediately appealed and reviewed. Here, the

September 17, 2024 order on appeal does not fit within any of the categories for being a

final order pursuant to R.C. 2505.02(B) and did not dispose of all the claims.

{¶4} In general, magistrates may enter orders without judicial approval if

necessary to regulate the proceedings and if the order is not dispositive of a claim or

defense of a party. Bahner v. Marketplace Mall, LLC, 2024-Ohio-1430, ¶ 5 (11th Dist.);

See also Civ.R. 53(D)(2)(a)(i). This court has stated that although a magistrate’s order is

effective without judicial approval, it is not “directly appealable,” and thus is simply

interlocutory in nature. Bahner at ¶ 5.

{¶5} Here, the September 17, 2024 magistrate’s order is not a final appealable

order and is simply interlocutory. Therefore, this court does not have jurisdiction to hear

this appeal. However, nothing prevents appellant from obtaining effective relief through

an appeal once the trial court has entered a final judgment in the action.

{¶6} Based upon the foregoing analysis, appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby

granted. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for lack of a final appealable order.

JOHN J. EKLUND, J., ROBERT J. PATTON, J., concur. 2

Case No. 2024-L-068

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

880 West Liberty, L.L.C. v. Hubbard Food Store, L.L.C.
2026 Ohio 401 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2026)
Lake Cty. Dept. of Job & Family Servs. v. Oatman
2025 Ohio 4636 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 Ohio 5265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonie-v-wallster-ohioctapp-2024.