McDonald v. Watson

208 Ill. App. 36
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedOctober 11, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 208 Ill. App. 36 (McDonald v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonald v. Watson, 208 Ill. App. 36 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Equity, § 461*—how decree pro confesso may he attacked as to averments of conclusions of law in hill. As to conclusions of law averred in a bill, a decree pro confesso may be attacked after its rendition by appeal or writ of error on the ground that the allegations in the bill do not sustain it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 Ill. App. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-watson-illappct-1917.