McDonald v. United States Postal Service

Fourth Circuit

McDonald v. United States Postal Service

519 F. App'x 162

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 23, 2013·No. No. 13-6204·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janine McDonald appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. McDonald v. United States Postal Serv., No. 1:12-cv-02759-ELH, 2013 WL 140914 (D.Md. Jan. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janine McDonald appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. McDonald v. United States Postal Serv., No. 1:12-cv-02759-ELH, 2013 WL 140914 (D.Md. Jan. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McDonald v. United States Postal Service, 519 F. App'x 162 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

519 F. App'x 162 (McDonald v. United States Postal Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.