McDonald v. United States
Opinion
Timmy McDonald appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2), 1915A (2006) his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McDonald v. United States, No. 2:07-cv-00082-REM-JSK, 2008 WL 4615017 (N.D. W.Va. Oct 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
325 F. App'x 212 (McDonald v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.