McDonald v. Tutty
This text of 27 S.E. 157 (McDonald v. Tutty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The mere fact that a declaration, was not filed in court the full number of days prescribed by law before the term to which it was made returnable, does not render a judgment 'therein taken by default at the next succeeding term void, the defendant having befen duly served before the appearance term and not having then, or at any time thereafter, made any objection to the return of the case as stated or any motion to have it made returnable to the proper term. Judgment rmersed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 S.E. 157, 99 Ga. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-tutty-ga-1896.