McDonald v. Thompson
This text of 23 La. Ann. 556 (McDonald v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment perpetuating an injunction obtained by the plaintiff.
During the trial the defendants took a bill of exceptions to the ruling of tho judge a quo, refusing to permit the husband of the plaintiff to testify, on the ground that husband and wife are prohibited from testifying for or against each other. We think the ruling was correct. The husband must of necessity have testified either in favor or against his wife in this caso. C. C. art. 2281.
We are convinced from the evidence, that the plaintiff is the owner of the property, the sale whereof was enjoined.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, with costs of
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 La. Ann. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-thompson-la-1871.