McDonald v. Tenth Court of Appeals

Texas Supreme Court

McDonald v. Tenth Court of Appeals

886 S.W.2d 955, 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 82, 1994 Tex. LEXIS 140, 1994 WL 626007

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 10, 1994

DocketNo. 94-0527

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 886 S.W.2d 955 (McDonald v. Tenth Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. Tenth Court of Appeals, 886 S.W.2d 955, 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 82, 1994 Tex. LEXIS 140, 1994 WL 626007 (Tex. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this original mandamus proceeding relator seeks review of an order protecting mental health records from discovery. Both the trial court and the court of appeals rendered decisions prior to our writing in R.K. v. Ramirez, 887 S.W.2d 836 (Tex.1994). We believe the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider the rulings of which relator complains in this proceeding in light of R.K. Accordingly, without addressing the merits of the petition and without prejudice to either party again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its rulings, we conditionally grant the writ and direct the court of appeals to vacate its opinion and order. The writ of mandamus will issue only in the unlikely event the court of appeals does not do so.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this original mandamus proceeding relator seeks review of an order protecting mental health records from discovery. Both the trial court and the court of appeals rendered decisions prior to our writing in R.K. v. Ramirez, 887 S.W.2d 836 (Tex.1994). We believe the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider the rulings of which relator complains in this proceeding in light of R.K. Accordingly, without addressing the merits of the petition and without prejudice to either party again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its rulings, we conditionally grant the writ and direct the court of appeals to vacate its opinion and order. The writ of mandamus will issue only in the unlikely event the court of appeals does not do so.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

886 S.W.2d 955, 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 82, 1994 Tex. LEXIS 140, 1994 WL 626007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-tenth-court-of-appeals-tex-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack