McDonald v. Sturtevant

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

McDonald v. Sturtevant

46 A. 142, 195 Pa. 648, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 699

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 7, 1900

DocketAppeal, No. 102

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A. 142 (McDonald v. Sturtevant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. Sturtevant, 46 A. 142, 195 Pa. 648, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 699 (Pa. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cttriam,

It is sufficient to say in this case that there is no satisfactory evidence showing that there ever was any written defeasance against the absolute deed made by K. C. McDonald to John C. Sturtevant, and therefore, under the provisions of the Act of June 8, 1881, P. L. 84, there' can be no recovery upon the claim made in the plaintiffs’ bill.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cttriam,

It is sufficient to say in this case that there is no satisfactory evidence showing that there ever was any written defeasance against the absolute deed made by K. C. McDonald to John C. Sturtevant, and therefore, under the provisions of the Act of June 8, 1881, P. L. 84, there' can be no recovery upon the claim made in the plaintiffs’ bill.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A. 142, 195 Pa. 648, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-sturtevant-pa-1900.