McDonald v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

McDonald v. State

91 S.W.2d 745

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDonald v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 Tex. Crim. 526 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 4, 1936·No. No. 18081·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. In the charge of the court and other matters of procedure we have perceived no defect which would justify a reversal of the judgment or require discussion. The record is before us without statement-of facts or bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. In the charge of the court and other matters of procedure we have perceived no defect which would justify a reversal of the judgment or require discussion. The record is before us without statement-of facts or bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.

McDonald v. State, 91 S.W.2d 745 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

91 S.W.2d 745 (McDonald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.