McDonald v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McDonald v. State

1913 OK CR 214, 132 P. 1195, 9 Okla. Crim. 729, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 219

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 7, 1913

DocketNo. A-1690.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 214 (McDonald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. State, 1913 OK CR 214, 132 P. 1195, 9 Okla. Crim. 729, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 219 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John McDonald, plaintiff in error, was convicted of unlawful conveying intoxicating liquor, and was on the 30th day of January, 1912, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for thirty days and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. Prom this judgment he appealed. No briefs have been filed. Por this reason the'Attorney General, when the case was called for final submission, moved to affirm for failure to prosecute the appeal.

The motion to affirm is sustained and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John McDonald, plaintiff in error, was convicted of unlawful conveying intoxicating liquor, and was on the 30th day of January, 1912, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for thirty days and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. Prom this judgment he appealed. No briefs have been filed. Por this reason the'Attorney General, when the case was called for final submission, moved to affirm for failure to prosecute the appeal.

The motion to affirm is sustained and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 214, 132 P. 1195, 9 Okla. Crim. 729, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.