McDonald v. State

187 S.E. 603, 54 Ga. App. 237, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 515
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 16, 1936
Docket25766
StatusPublished

This text of 187 S.E. 603 (McDonald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonald v. State, 187 S.E. 603, 54 Ga. App. 237, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Guerry, J.

The defendant was indicted for, and convicted of, the larceny of a certain automobile. His motion for new trial contains only the usual general grounds. The evidence was amply sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for new

trial. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 S.E. 603, 54 Ga. App. 237, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-state-gactapp-1936.