McDonald v. State
72 Ga. 211
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDonald v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 Ga. 55 →
Opinion
1. The grounds of the motion for a new trial are certified by the judge' to he incorrect, except that which alleges that the verdict is against the evidence and the law. So that this alone can he considered.
2. On examining the record, the evidence appears ample to sustain the verdict; and, therefore, it is not against the weight of evidence1 or the law.
(Head-notes by the court.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McDonald v. State, 72 Ga. 211 (Ga. 1883).
72 Ga. 211 (McDonald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.