McDonald v. State

128 So. 3d 930, 2013 WL 6703505, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20243
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDonald v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17645
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 2013·No. No. 1D12-4727·Published

Opinion

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State’s concession of error is well-taken. See Jaimes v. State, 51 So.3d 445, 448M9 (Fla.2010). Appellant’s conviction and sentence as to Count 7 are therefore REVERSED, and this cause is REMANDED for a new trial as to Count 7. Appellant’s convictions and sentences on all other counts are otherwise affirmed.

CLARK, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. State, 128 So. 3d 930, 2013 WL 6703505, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20243 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

128 So. 3d 930 (McDonald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jaimes v. State
51 So. 3d 445 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)