Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McDonald v. State

McDonald v. State

895 So. 2d 1262, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3081, 2005 WL 545197
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDonald v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 912 So. 2d 74 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 2005·No. No. 3D05-304·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. A trial court’s order denying, on the merits, a motion to mitigate sentence is not appealable. See Ward v. State, 854 So.2d 260, 261 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. State, 895 So. 2d 1262, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3081, 2005 WL 545197 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

895 So. 2d 1262 (McDonald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. State
854 So. 2d 260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)