McDonald v. State

474 So. 2d 1261, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2073, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15729
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 1985·No. No. BC-458·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

McDonald appeals from his sentence imposed under the sentencing guidelines. Based on the record before us, we find that appellant elected to be sentenced under the guidelines. Newsome v. State, 466 So.2d 411 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Jordan v. State, 460 So.2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). However, we hold that the trial court improperly utilized two scoresheets in arriving at appellant’s sentence. Rule 3.701 d.l., Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, explicitly states that only one scoresheet shall be prepared for each defendant covering all offenses pending before the court for sentencing. Vileta v. State, 454 So.2d 792 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Accordingly, the sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing under the guideline rules in effect at the time of imposition of the original sentence. Saunders v. State, 459 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. State, 474 So. 2d 1261, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2073, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15729 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

474 So. 2d 1261 (McDonald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
480 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)