McDonald v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

McDonald v. State

192 So. 59, 29 Ala. App. 109, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 52

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 14, 1939

Docket2 Div. 668.

StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 59 (McDonald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. State, 192 So. 59, 29 Ala. App. 109, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 52 (Ala. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

From a judgment of conviction for the offense of “distilling” and “unlawful possession of a still,” etc., and sentence to the penitentiary for not less than 18 months, nor more than 24 months, this appeal was taken.

The appeal is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions.

Upon examination we find the record regular and without apparent error thereon. No other question is presented, therefore it follows that the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken must be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

From a judgment of conviction for the offense of “distilling” and “unlawful possession of a still,” etc., and sentence to the penitentiary for not less than 18 months, nor more than 24 months, this appeal was taken.

The appeal is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions.

Upon examination we find the record regular and without apparent error thereon. No other question is presented, therefore it follows that the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken must be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 So. 59, 29 Ala. App. 109, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-state-alactapp-1939.