McDonald v. State

349 So. 2d 102, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 1819
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided August 26, 1977·No. SC 2706·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MADDOX, Justice.

Writ denied. By denying the writ, we point out that writs of certiorari are frequently denied without any consideration of the merits. Haden v. Olan Mills, Inc., 273 Ala. 129, 135 So.2d 388 (1961). A denial of certiorari should never be considered as an expression by the reviewing court on the merits of the controversy. See Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers, 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916). Our denial of the writ should not be understood as approving or disapproving the language used, or the statements of law contained in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Cooper v. State, 287 Ala. 728, 252 So.2d 108 (1971).

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. State, 349 So. 2d 102, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 1819 (Ala. 1977).

349 So. 2d 102 (McDonald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. State
437 So. 2d 1337 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)