McDonald v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of Kansas

McDonald v. Rhodes

42 P.2d 46, 140 Kan. 744, 1934 Kan. LEXIS 224

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedDecember 8, 1934

DocketNo. 32,295

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 42 P.2d 46 (McDonald v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. Rhodes, 42 P.2d 46, 140 Kan. 744, 1934 Kan. LEXIS 224 (kan 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Until a state officer-elect has qualified according to law he has no greater privilege of access to the affairs of the office than any other private citizen; and the incumbent in lawful possession of the office cannot be compelled by mandamus to permit the officer-elect to make an audit of such office before the latter has given his official bond and had it approved in conformity with the pertinent statutes.

Motion for alternative writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Until a state officer-elect has qualified according to law he has no greater privilege of access to the affairs of the office than any other private citizen; and the incumbent in lawful possession of the office cannot be compelled by mandamus to permit the officer-elect to make an audit of such office before the latter has given his official bond and had it approved in conformity with the pertinent statutes.

Motion for alternative writ denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 P.2d 46, 140 Kan. 744, 1934 Kan. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-rhodes-kan-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack