McDonald v. Padgett
This text of 35 So. 336 (McDonald v. Padgett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal here is from an interlocutory order for preliminary injunction against trespass to realty by cutting trees, granted under section 1469 of the Revised Statutes to one claiming to own “the turpentine in and on the pine trees” on the land in'question with the privilege of cutting, boxing and scraping the said trees. The section referred to gives the right to injunction to “any person 'claiming to own any timbered lands in this State.” [502]*502This was held in the recent case of Doke v. Peek, 45 Fla. 248, 34 South. Rep. 896, not to apply to the owner of growing timber upon land, and, a fortiori, does not give a right of action to one owning only the turpentine in the trees. No irreparable injury or other ground of equitable intervention is claimed.
The order granting the preliminary injunction is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 So. 336, 46 Fla. 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-padgett-fla-1903.