McDonald v. Okeelanta Corp.

917 So. 2d 1063, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 367, 2006 WL 119312
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 18, 2006
DocketNo. 4D05-188
StatusPublished

This text of 917 So. 2d 1063 (McDonald v. Okeelanta Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonald v. Okeelanta Corp., 917 So. 2d 1063, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 367, 2006 WL 119312 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sugar Cane Growers Coop. of Florida, Inc. v. Pinnock (Pinnock I), 735 So.2d 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), and Pinnock v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op. of Florida, Inc. (Pinnock II), 791 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

POLEN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pinnock v. SUGAR CANE GROWERS CO-OP.
791 So. 2d 1135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida, Inc. v. Pinnock
735 So. 2d 530 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
917 So. 2d 1063, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 367, 2006 WL 119312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-okeelanta-corp-fladistctapp-2006.