McDonald v. Okeelanta Corp.

917 So. 2d 1063, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 367, 2006 WL 119312
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 18, 2006·No. No. 4D05-188·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sugar Cane Growers Coop. of Florida, Inc. v. Pinnock (Pinnock I), 735 So.2d 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), and Pinnock v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op. of Florida, Inc. (Pinnock II), 791 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

POLEN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. Okeelanta Corp., 917 So. 2d 1063, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 367, 2006 WL 119312 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

917 So. 2d 1063 (McDonald v. Okeelanta Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pinnock v. SUGAR CANE GROWERS CO-OP.
791 So. 2d 1135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida, Inc. v. Pinnock
735 So. 2d 530 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)