McDonald v. Nicholson

Fourth Circuit

McDonald v. Nicholson

593 F. App'x 236

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 19, 2015

DocketNo. 15-6007

StatusPublished

This text of 593 F. App'x 236 (McDonald v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. Nicholson, 593 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Sentellus McDonald appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. McDonald v. Nicholson, No. 5:14-ct-03103-H (E.D.N.C. June 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Sentellus McDonald appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. McDonald v. Nicholson, No. 5:14-ct-03103-H (E.D.N.C. June 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

593 F. App'x 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-nicholson-ca4-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack