McDonald v. Nassau Queens Medical Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McDonald v. Nassau Queens Medical Group

207 A.D.2d 387, 616 N.Y.S.2d 224

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 8, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 387 (McDonald v. Nassau Queens Medical Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. Nassau Queens Medical Group, 207 A.D.2d 387, 616 N.Y.S.2d 224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant North Shore University Hospital appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated October 6, 1992, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendant hospital for summary judgment. There are questions of fact as to whether the care and treatment of the mother and the infant plaintiff were rendered solely by or under the direction of the mother’s private obstetrician or whether the hospital’s employees were responsible for the alleged malpractice. Ritter, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant North Shore University Hospital appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated October 6, 1992, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendant hospital for summary judgment. There are questions of fact as to whether the care and treatment of the mother and the infant plaintiff were rendered solely by or under the direction of the mother’s private obstetrician or whether the hospital’s employees were responsible for the alleged malpractice. Ritter, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 387, 616 N.Y.S.2d 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-nassau-queens-medical-group-nyappdiv-1994.