McDonald v. Mountain Lake Water Co.

4 Cal. 335
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1854
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cal. 335 (McDonald v. Mountain Lake Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonald v. Mountain Lake Water Co., 4 Cal. 335 (Cal. 1854).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Oh. J. Murray concurred.

The action is for the payment which, by the terms of the written contract, was to be made in September, on account of the work done in September. It is objected to the recovery, that the stipulated amount of work for the month was greater than that performed, and, therefore, the averment of performance is not sustained by the contract. It is well shown, however, by the pleadings, and the special finding, that the quantity of work was diminished at the instance and request of the defendant. This must be regarded as a waiver, which excuses the performance. But if, as is contended by the plaintiffs in error, it is a parol variation of an agreement under seal, such variation will be upheld after its execution, because one will not be permitted to take advantage of the non-performance of that which he prevented. (Green v. Wells, 2 Cal. 584.)

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Robert Wells & Co.
2 Cal. 584 (California Supreme Court, 1852)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Cal. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-mountain-lake-water-co-cal-1854.