McDonald v. McDonald

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McDonald v. McDonald

679 So. 2d 868, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9795, 1996 WL 525879

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDonald v. McDonald. Read the opinion of the Court — 732 So. 2d 505 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 1996·No. No. 95-3498·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former wife appeals from the adverse aspects of a comprehensive and detailed final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We have examined each of her contentions in the light of the record and the judgment under review and conclude that none presents reversible error. The trial court’s conclusions were based on a view of the record it was entitled to accept and an exercise of its discretion with which we are powerless to interfere. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The former wife appeals from the adverse aspects of a comprehensive and detailed final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We have examined each of her contentions in the light of the record and the judgment under review and conclude that none presents reversible error. The trial court’s conclusions were based on a view of the record it was entitled to accept and an exercise of its discretion with which we are powerless to interfere. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.

McDonald v. McDonald, 679 So. 2d 868, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9795, 1996 WL 525879 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

679 So. 2d 868 (McDonald v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related