McDonald v. McDonald

413 So. 2d 779, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19670
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 30, 1982
DocketNo. 81-1215
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 413 So. 2d 779 (McDonald v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonald v. McDonald, 413 So. 2d 779, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19670 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error or abuse of discretion has been demonstrated with respect to the trial judge’s rulings which (a) awarded the wife a one-half interest in real property in Kentucky as lump sum alimony and provided for appointment of a commissioner to convey the property; and (b) awarded the wife periodic alimony. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Williamson v. Williamson, 367 So.2d 1016 (Fla.1979); Schwartz v. Schwartz, 396 So.2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Sec. 61.08, Fla.Stat.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coll v. Coll
579 So. 2d 354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
413 So. 2d 779, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-mcdonald-fladistctapp-1982.