McDonald v. Mayer

23 S.E. 72, 97 Ga. 281
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 12, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 S.E. 72 (McDonald v. Mayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonald v. Mayer, 23 S.E. 72, 97 Ga. 281 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The action being upon a promissory note which had been pledged to the plaintiff as collateral security for the payment of an open account, the admission of the defendant in the agreed statement of facts, to the effect that the plaintiff had obtained the note before its maturity, did not cut off his defense that the plaintiff was not a bona fide holder of the note, and that the consideration thereof had failed; nor render inadmissible evidence supporting a meritorious plea of failure of consideration. It was therefore erroneous to strike the plea, refuse to permit the defendant to introduce evidence in support of it, and render a judgment against him. Evidence successfully impeaching the bona fides of the plaintiff’s holding, would let in against him all defenses to the note which would have been available against the original payee. Judgment affirmed.

The court struck the plea and rendered judgment for plaintiff. To this ruling defendant excepted. R. II. Poioell é Son, for plaintiff in error. D. II. Pope, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pidcock v. Merchants National Bank
66 S.E. 973 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 S.E. 72, 97 Ga. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-mayer-ga-1895.