McDonald v. Louis K. Liggett Co.
This text of 241 A.D. 913 (McDonald v. Louis K. Liggett Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s evidence discloses that the floor was wet with soapy water. She was expressly invited to pass along the corridor where the dangerous condition existed, and in the dimly lighted store she could not be held bound, as a matter of law, to discover the condition of the floor. The [914]*914man who was performing the mopping operation was not within the view of the plaintiff, and the mop and pail were not located where plaintiff could see them. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-louis-k-liggett-co-nyappdiv-1934.