McDonald v. Illinois Central R. R.
83 Ill. App. 463, 1899 Ill. App. LEXIS 178
Opinion
Mr. Justice Horton could not participate in the consideration and decision of this cause by reason of his relations with one of the counsel for plaintiff in error.
The remaining justices are unable to agree, and the judgment must therefore be affirmed by a divided court. No opinion can therefore be filed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McDonald v. Illinois Central R. R., 83 Ill. App. 463, 1899 Ill. App. LEXIS 178 (Ill. Ct. App. 1899).
83 Ill. App. 463 (McDonald v. Illinois Central R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Binder v. Langhorst
139 Ill. App. 493 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1908)