McDonald v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas

McDonald v. Hill

401 S.W.2d 160

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 10, 1966

DocketNo. 6771

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 401 S.W.2d 160 (McDonald v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. Hill, 401 S.W.2d 160 (Tex. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PARKER, Justice.

J. P. Hill and wife, Madaline Hill, sued R. L. McDonald, d/b/a Mack’s Farm and Ranch Supply, for excessive charges on feed, damages caused plaintiffs by defendant threatening to file criminal charges against plaintiffs and other matters immaterial to disposition of this case. Defendant filed a plea of privilege to be sued in Polk County, where he resided. Plaintiffs controverted defendant’s plea of privilege. Order overruling plea of privilege of defendant was entered October 20, 1964. Appeal therefrom was duly perfected by defendant below, appellant here.

No briefs have been filed. The cause was submitted on a transcript and statement of facts. There is no fundamental error. Appellant having failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, which by extension granted was January 1, 1966, under authority of Rule 415, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARKER, Justice.

J. P. Hill and wife, Madaline Hill, sued R. L. McDonald, d/b/a Mack’s Farm and Ranch Supply, for excessive charges on feed, damages caused plaintiffs by defendant threatening to file criminal charges against plaintiffs and other matters immaterial to disposition of this case. Defendant filed a plea of privilege to be sued in Polk County, where he resided. Plaintiffs controverted defendant’s plea of privilege. Order overruling plea of privilege of defendant was entered October 20, 1964. Appeal therefrom was duly perfected by defendant below, appellant here.

No briefs have been filed. The cause was submitted on a transcript and statement of facts. There is no fundamental error. Appellant having failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, which by extension granted was January 1, 1966, under authority of Rule 415, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

401 S.W.2d 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-hill-texapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack