McDonald v. Head
Opinion
McDonald brought an equitable petition against Mrs. Head, seeking to enjoin a proceeding by her to sell certain land under a judgment obtained by her against him for an unpaid balance of the purchase-money. He alleged, that the defendant had leased certain portions of the property sold to him to other persons, with the privilege on their part of purchasing such portions at as high a price as others would give therefor; that he took a bond for title from her, and entered into an agreement with her to carry out her contracts with such persons; that afterward he made bonds for title to them, collected sums of money from them, and paid over the amounts collected to his vendor; and that he was insolvent and unable to respond in damages for a breach of his bonds. The defendant denied that she had received any payments made by the holders of the original options. The holders of the options [457] sought to intervene. Their interventions were dismissed, but they did not except. The injunction was denied, and the plaintiff excepted.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
85 S.E. 317 (McDonald v. Head) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.