McDonald v. Hardee

95 S.E. 320, 22 Ga. App. 96, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 169
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 15, 1918·No. 9436·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. “Where cotton is delivered by the owner to another to be ginned for a specific price, this is a bailment for hire. Therefore, where . the cotton, is lost by the bailee, the onus is upon him to show due care and diligence in protecting and keeping it.” Concord Variety Works v. Beckham, 112 Ga. 242 (37 S. E. 392).

2. This case is here upo,n exception - to the overruling of a motion for a new trial, based' on the general grounds only. The evidence authorized, the verdict, which has the approval of the trial .judge, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and JenJdns, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. Hardee, 95 S.E. 320, 22 Ga. App. 96, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 169 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

95 S.E. 320 (McDonald v. Hardee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Center Point Gin v. Hathcock
111 S.E. 575 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Hight Accessory Place v. Lam
105 S.E. 872 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)