McDonald v. Florida Erection Services

437 So. 2d 188, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20157
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 26, 1983
DocketNo. AP-67
StatusPublished

This text of 437 So. 2d 188 (McDonald v. Florida Erection Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonald v. Florida Erection Services, 437 So. 2d 188, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20157 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied, 437 So.2d 678 (Fla.App.1983). Section 440.15(3)(b)(l), Florida Statutes (1979) specifically subjects wage-loss benefits to the maximum compensation rate. The constitutionality of the wage-loss statute has already been upheld. Acton v. Ft. Lauderdale Hospital, 418 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

LARRY G. SMITH, JOANOS and NIM-MONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Acton v. Ft. Lauderdale Hosp.
418 So. 2d 1099 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
437 So. 2d 188, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-florida-erection-services-fladistctapp-1983.