McDonald v. Fett
49 Cal. 354
This text of 49 Cal. 354 (McDonald v. Fett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McDonald v. Fett, 49 Cal. 354 (Cal. 1874).
Opinion
By the act of signing an attachment bond, the surety does not become a participant in the seizure or detention of the attached property by the Sheriff, or liable as a trespasser for such acts. His liability arises under his contract merely, and is limited by its terms and conditions.
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McGinley v. Maryland Casualty Co.
277 P. 414 (Montana Supreme Court, 1929)
Summerland v. Automobile Funding Co.
148 N.E. 202 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1925)
Jordan v. Henderson
86 S.W. 961 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1905)
Elder v. Kutner
32 P. 563 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 Cal. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-fett-cal-1874.