McDonald v. Fenzel

224 A.D.2d 261, 638 N.Y.S.2d 15, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1067
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered November 21, 1994, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for a judicial settlement of a partnership accounting that was prepared on a cash basis and directed defendants to prepare the accounting on an accrual basis, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that absent a provision in the parties’ partnership agreement specifying the method of accounting, whether cash or accrual, to be used upon dissolution of the partnership, the accrual method is to be used (Jackson v Hunt, Hill & Betts, 7 NY2d 180, 183). We do not construe the provisions relied upon by defendants to constitute a direction for an accounting on a cash basis. We have considered defendants’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rubin, Ross and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. Fenzel, 224 A.D.2d 261, 638 N.Y.S.2d 15, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

224 A.D.2d 261 (McDonald v. Fenzel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wiesenthal v. Wiesenthal
52 A.D.3d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
McDonald v. Fenzel
233 A.D.2d 219 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)