McDonald v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE CO.
735 N.W.2d 214, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 1663, 2007 WL 2164607
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDonald v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE CO.. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 996 →
Opinion
Mary Ellen McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FARM BUREAU INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion to strike appellant's reply brief and supplement to appendix and the motion to expand the record on appeal are considered, and the motion to strike appellant's reply brief and supplement to appendix is DENIED. The motion to expand the record on appeal is GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McDonald v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE CO., 735 N.W.2d 214, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 1663, 2007 WL 2164607 (Mich. 2007).
735 N.W.2d 214 (McDonald v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE CO.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.