McDonald v. Eagle & Phenix Manufacturing Co.

67 Ga. 761
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 15, 1881·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

“The principal is liable for his own negligence-or misconduct, and hence his liability rests on his own negligence or misconduct in the employment of his agents; and if he uses ordinary diligence in employing competent men it is enough to relieve him. He is not liable for the negligence of a fellow-servant while engaged in the same employment, unless he has been negligent in the selection of that servant, or retained him after knowledge of his incompetency. Nor will the fact that the person is found incompetent, of itself, and without more, show negligence of the master ; but it must further appear that the master knew or might have known, by ordinary diligence, the incompetency of the agent or servant. Law of master and servant, 333, 423-432; 2d Thomps., 969; Sherman & Red., 31; 1 Am. Rail., 536.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. Eagle & Phenix Manufacturing Co., 67 Ga. 761 (Ga. 1881).

67 Ga. 761 (McDonald v. Eagle & Phenix Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stevens v. Bibb Manufacturing Co.
86 S.E. 445 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Moore v. King Manufacturing Co.
53 S.E. 107 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Kerr v. Crown Cotton Mills
31 S.E. 166 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Cates v. Itner
30 S.E. 884 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
McGovern v. Columbus Manufacturing Co.
5 S.E. 492 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)