McDonald v. Dudek

100 A.D.2d 839, 473 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17945
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 2, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered June 9, 1983, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment against defendant Stanley Dudek. I Order affirmed, with costs. H The affidavit in support of the motion for pártial summary judgment against defendant Dudek failed to rule out the existence of triable issues of fact. In the absence of a sufficient affidavit in support of the motion, the failure of Dudek himself to supply an affidavit in opposition cannot be the basis for granting summary judgment to the plaintiff (Coley v Michelin Tire Corp., 99 AD2d 795). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. Dudek, 100 A.D.2d 839, 473 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

100 A.D.2d 839 (McDonald v. Dudek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Durkin v. IDI Construction
180 Misc. 2d 613 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Sofia
147 Misc. 2d 651 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1990)