McDonald v. Drew

15 A. 148, 64 N.H. 547
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 15 A. 148 (McDonald v. Drew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonald v. Drew, 15 A. 148, 64 N.H. 547 (N.H. 1888).

Opinion

Allen, J.

The judgment upon which the action is brought, and upon which the plaintiff relies if the court where the judgment was rendered had jurisdiction, is conclusive between the parties, and cannot be reversed, set aside, or impeached, for fraud in obtaining it, in this suit. It can be reversed only by a direct proceeding for that purpose in the court where it was rendered. The defence of fraud in obtaining the judgment cannot in this mode be made, °and the brief statement of defence was properly rejected. Metcalf v. Gilmore, 59 N. H. 417.

Exception overruled.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGee v. Rodriquez
738 P.2d 937 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1987)
Lovejoy v. Ashworth
45 A.2d 218 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1946)
Pendexter v. Cate
20 A. 331 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A. 148, 64 N.H. 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-drew-nh-1888.