McDonald v. Drew

15 A. 148, 64 N.H. 547
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1888·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Allen, J.

The judgment upon which the action is brought, and upon which the plaintiff relies if the court where the judgment was rendered had jurisdiction, is conclusive between the parties, and cannot be reversed, set aside, or impeached, for fraud in obtaining it, in this suit. It can be reversed only by a direct proceeding for that purpose in the court where it was rendered. The defence of fraud in obtaining the judgment cannot in this mode be made, °and the brief statement of defence was properly rejected. Metcalf v. Gilmore, 59 N. H. 417.

Exception overruled.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. Drew, 15 A. 148, 64 N.H. 547 (N.H. 1888).

15 A. 148 (McDonald v. Drew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGee v. Rodriquez
738 P.2d 937 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1987)
Lovejoy v. Ashworth
45 A.2d 218 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1946)
Pendexter v. Cate
20 A. 331 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1890)