McDonald v. Drager

Michigan Court of Appeals

McDonald v. Drager

183 N.W.2d 333, 27 Mich. App. 346, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1337

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 26, 1970

DocketDocket Nos. 7,949, 7,950

StatusPublished

This text of 183 N.W.2d 333 (McDonald v. Drager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. Drager, 183 N.W.2d 333, 27 Mich. App. 346, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1337 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In each of the cases involved, the trial judges granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(1). Each appeal questions the propriety of summary disposition. It is apparent that the cause of litigation in each instance is disagreement between the mayor and the city council of Roseville as to their respective authority in the municipal affairs of their community.

We perceive no jurisprudential purpose to be served by lengthy discussion of the issues raised on appeal, and, conceivably, by doing so, we would add to the existing disharmony between these municipal officials.

We have reviewed the trial court records and we have considered the briefs filed by the parties. We are not persuaded that the trial judges erred in granting summary judgment for defendants.

Affirmed but without costs, a public question being involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In each of the cases involved, the trial judges granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(1). Each appeal questions the propriety of summary disposition. It is apparent that the cause of litigation in each instance is disagreement between the mayor and the city council of Roseville as to their respective authority in the municipal affairs of their community.

We perceive no jurisprudential purpose to be served by lengthy discussion of the issues raised on appeal, and, conceivably, by doing so, we would add to the existing disharmony between these municipal officials.

We have reviewed the trial court records and we have considered the briefs filed by the parties. We are not persuaded that the trial judges erred in granting summary judgment for defendants.

Affirmed but without costs, a public question being involved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 N.W.2d 333, 27 Mich. App. 346, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-drager-michctapp-1970.