McDonald v. Dooley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

McDonald v. Dooley

1936 OK 555, 61 P.2d 190, 177 Okla. 507, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 401

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 29, 1936·No. No. 25902.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was tried and a judgment rendered for the defendants, denying the application of the plaintiff for a new trial. The plaintiff prosecuted an appeal and filed his petition in error on September 29, 1934, and on June 29, 1935, filed his brief, whieh reasonably sustains the allegations of his petition in error.

Defendant in error has filed no brief nor *508 offered any excuse for such failure. The cause is therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial.

McNEILL, C. X, OSBORN, V. O. X, and BAYLESS, CORN, and GIBSON, XT., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was tried and a judgment rendered for the defendants, denying the application of the plaintiff for a new trial. The plaintiff prosecuted an appeal and filed his petition in error on September 29, 1934, and on June 29, 1935, filed his brief, whieh reasonably sustains the allegations of his petition in error.

Defendant in error has filed no brief nor *508 offered any excuse for such failure. The cause is therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial.

McNEILL, C. X, OSBORN, V. O. X, and BAYLESS, CORN, and GIBSON, XT., concur.

McDonald v. Dooley, 1936 OK 555, 61 P.2d 190, 177 Okla. 507, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 401 (Okla. 1936).

Pincite

1936 OK 555 (McDonald v. Dooley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related