McDonald v. Division of Corrections for Maryland

Fourth Circuit

McDonald v. Division of Corrections for Maryland

523 F. App'x 247

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2013·No. No. 13-6647·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul B. McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McDonald v. Div. of Corr. For Md., No. 8:13-cv-00775-PJM (D.Md. Mar. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul B. McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McDonald v. Div. of Corr. For Md., No. 8:13-cv-00775-PJM (D.Md. Mar. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McDonald v. Division of Corrections for Maryland, 523 F. App'x 247 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

523 F. App'x 247 (McDonald v. Division of Corrections for Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related