McDonald v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

McDonald v. Director of Revenue

932 S.W.2d 901, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1797, 1996 WL 625292

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDonald v. Director of Revenue. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 45 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 1996·No. No. 69414·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals the denial of his request for a trial de novo to review the revocation of his driver’s license under § 302.505, RSMo 1994, for driving with a blood-alcohol content of .10 percent or more. Petitioner alleges the trial court erred 1) in admitting exhibits A and B because the court failed to judicially recognize the relevant state regulations, and 2) that the records submitted to the court contained insufficient evidence to establish probable cause for arrest. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals the denial of his request for a trial de novo to review the revocation of his driver’s license under § 302.505, RSMo 1994, for driving with a blood-alcohol content of .10 percent or more. Petitioner alleges the trial court erred 1) in admitting exhibits A and B because the court failed to judicially recognize the relevant state regulations, and 2) that the records submitted to the court contained insufficient evidence to establish probable cause for arrest. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

McDonald v. Director of Revenue, 932 S.W.2d 901, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1797, 1996 WL 625292 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

932 S.W.2d 901 (McDonald v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.