McDonald v. Dayton

Ohio Supreme Court

McDonald v. Dayton

763 N.E.2d 184, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1475, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 463

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 19, 2002

Docket01-2282

StatusPublished

This text of 763 N.E.2d 184 (McDonald v. Dayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. Dayton, 763 N.E.2d 184, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1475, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 463 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 18721. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and cross-appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellee/crossappellant has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of cross-appeal, due January 30, 2002, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute the cross-appeal with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the cross-appeal be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.

The appeal of the city of Dayton et al. remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery App. No. 18721. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and cross-appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellee/crossappellant has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of cross-appeal, due January 30, 2002, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute the cross-appeal with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the cross-appeal be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.

The appeal of the city of Dayton et al. remains pending.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

763 N.E.2d 184, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1475, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-dayton-ohio-2002.