McDonald v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided January 24, 2022·No. 6:20-cv-02219·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON WYEN BRYANT MCDONALD Civil No. 6:20-cv-02219-AC

Plaintiff, ORDER TO PAY vs., EAJA FEES KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Comissioner Social Security, Defendant.

Acosta, Judge: Following my review of Plaintiff’s Motion and supporting documentation, and after consideration of Defendant’s stipulation, and pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, $ $11,030.00 is awarded to Plaintiff as EAJA fees in care of her attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, and the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Nancy J. Meserow, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney Nancy J. Meserow, subject to the satisfaction of Plaintiff's debts, if any, under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010); and in addition, Plaintiff is awarded $10.00 for postage expenses, so that the total amount awarded equals $11,040.00. Any check issued for EAJA fees or for expenses shall be sent to Plaintiff in care of his attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, at her office, located at the following address: Law Office of Nancy J. Meserow 7540 SW 51st Ave. Portland, OR 97219. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 24th day of January, 2022

________________________________________ John V. Acosta UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2022).

McDonald v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (McDonald v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)