McDonald v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 906, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2222
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDonald v. Commissioner. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 B.T.A. 1340
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided October 19, 1925·No. Docket No. 3194.·Published

Opinion

[907]*907OPINION.

James:

The taxpayer claims that his inventories in his retail stores were inflated by reason of the fact that they contained a charge from the wholesale stores of 5 per cent of cost representing a charge added to cover the cost of handling shipment, etc., between the wholesale and retail departments. Assuming, as we must, that this charge represented with reasonable accuracy the actual cost of handling the merchandise, it is apparent that the wholesale department included in its sale to the branches merchandise billed at original cost, plus an estimate for cost of handling, and that it deducted in its accounting the actual cost of handling. The merchandise when so billed to the branch stores was therefore billed at cost and not at cost plus a profit, as the taxpayer alleges. Inventories in the retail stores taken on the basis of the billing of merchandise to them were, therefore, correctly taken and the taxpayer is in error in his claim that such inventories were taken at an inflated price. Such being the case, the determination of the Commissioner must be approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. Commissioner, 2 B.T.A. 906, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2222 (bta 1925).

2 B.T.A. 906 (McDonald v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Appeal of McDonald
2 B.T.A. 906 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)