McDonald v. Champagne

Louisiana Court of Appeal

McDonald v. Champagne

355 So. 2d 1345, 1978 La. App. LEXIS 3804

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided February 6, 1978·No. No. 6268·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Percy A. Champagne, Jr. v. Dorothy G. McDonald, and Fireman’s Insurance Company, 355 So.2d 1335 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1978), we conclude that the accident giving rise to this litigation was caused solely and proximately by the negligence of Dorothy G. McDonald. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment dismissing plaintiff’s suit. Costs both on the trial level and on appeal are to be borne by plaintiff.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Percy A. Champagne, Jr. v. Dorothy G. McDonald, and Fireman’s Insurance Company, 355 So.2d 1335 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1978), we conclude that the accident giving rise to this litigation was caused solely and proximately by the negligence of Dorothy G. McDonald. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment dismissing plaintiff’s suit. Costs both on the trial level and on appeal are to be borne by plaintiff.

AFFIRMED.

McDonald v. Champagne, 355 So. 2d 1345, 1978 La. App. LEXIS 3804 (La. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

355 So. 2d 1345 (McDonald v. Champagne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related