McDonald v. Champagne

Louisiana Court of Appeal

McDonald v. Champagne

355 So. 2d 1345, 1978 La. App. LEXIS 3804

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 6, 1978

DocketNo. 6268

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 355 So. 2d 1345 (McDonald v. Champagne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. Champagne, 355 So. 2d 1345, 1978 La. App. LEXIS 3804 (La. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Percy A. Champagne, Jr. v. Dorothy G. McDonald, and Fireman’s Insurance Company, 355 So.2d 1335 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1978), we conclude that the accident giving rise to this litigation was caused solely and proximately by the negligence of Dorothy G. McDonald. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment dismissing plaintiff’s suit. Costs both on the trial level and on appeal are to be borne by plaintiff.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Percy A. Champagne, Jr. v. Dorothy G. McDonald, and Fireman’s Insurance Company, 355 So.2d 1335 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1978), we conclude that the accident giving rise to this litigation was caused solely and proximately by the negligence of Dorothy G. McDonald. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment dismissing plaintiff’s suit. Costs both on the trial level and on appeal are to be borne by plaintiff.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 So. 2d 1345, 1978 La. App. LEXIS 3804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-champagne-lactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack