McDonald v. Brass Goods Manufacturing Co.

New York Supreme Court

McDonald v. Brass Goods Manufacturing Co.

2 Abb. N. Cas. 434

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1877

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Abb. N. Cas. 434 (McDonald v. Brass Goods Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. Brass Goods Manufacturing Co., 2 Abb. N. Cas. 434 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Barnard, J.,

Held, that the guardian ad litem should not have been appointed unless the papers upon which application was made showed her pecuniary responsibility ; and ordered her to file security for costs in the sum of $500, with two sufficient sureties, to be approved by a justice of the court or the county judge, on or before the 3rd day of September, 1877, and that until such security was so approved and filed all proceedings on the part of the plaintiff should be stayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnard, J.,

Held, that the guardian ad litem should not have been appointed unless the papers upon which application was made showed her pecuniary responsibility ; and ordered her to file security for costs in the sum of $500, with two sufficient sureties, to be approved by a justice of the court or the county judge, on or before the 3rd day of September, 1877, and that until such security was so approved and filed all proceedings on the part of the plaintiff should be stayed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Abb. N. Cas. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-brass-goods-manufacturing-co-nysupct-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack