McDonald v. Ames Supply Co.
This text of 27 A.D.2d 559 (McDonald v. Ames Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 19, 1966, affirmed, without costs. The third-party summons [560]*560and complaint, which were left with a building receptionist who thereafter delivered them to the respondent corporation’s sales manager, were not delivered to a person authorized to receive service on behalf of a corporation (CPLR 311, subd. 1; cf. Ziembicki v. Mott Improvement Corp., 18 A D 2d 926; Clark v. Fifty Seventh Madison Corp., 13 A D 2d 693). Beldock, P. J., TJghetta, Christ, Hill and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 559, 275 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-ames-supply-co-nyappdiv-1966.