McDonald v. Ames Supply Co.
27 A.D.2d 559, 275 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2830
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 1966·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 19, 1966, affirmed, without costs. The third-party summons [560]*560and complaint, which were left with a building receptionist who thereafter delivered them to the respondent corporation’s sales manager, were not delivered to a person authorized to receive service on behalf of a corporation (CPLR 311, subd. 1; cf. Ziembicki v. Mott Improvement Corp., 18 A D 2d 926; Clark v. Fifty Seventh Madison Corp., 13 A D 2d 693). Beldock, P. J., TJghetta, Christ, Hill and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McDonald v. Ames Supply Co., 27 A.D.2d 559, 275 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).
27 A.D.2d 559 (McDonald v. Ames Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Downs v. M.P.T. Beauty Salon, Inc.
129 A.D.2d 674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Schuck v. 7309 Corp.
90 A.D.2d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)