McDonald Scott Hollis and Xcel Energy Third Party Defendent v. Sherri Lee Hollis
Opinion
NO. 07-03-0240-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
SEPTEMBER 3, 2003
XCEL ENERGY, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT, Appellant
v.
SHERRI LEE HOLLIS,
Appellee
FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;
NO. 50,756-C; HON. PATRICK A. PIRTLE, PRESIDING
Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Xcel Energy, by and through their attorneys, have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because they longer desire to prosecute it. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Brian Quinn
Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McDonald Scott Hollis and Xcel Energy Third Party Defendent v. Sherri Lee Hollis (McDonald Scott Hollis and Xcel Energy Third Party Defendent v. Sherri Lee Hollis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.