McDonald Scott Hollis and Xcel Energy Third Party Defendent v. Sherri Lee Hollis
This text of McDonald Scott Hollis and Xcel Energy Third Party Defendent v. Sherri Lee Hollis (McDonald Scott Hollis and Xcel Energy Third Party Defendent v. Sherri Lee Hollis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-03-0240-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
SEPTEMBER 3, 2003 ______________________________
XCEL ENERGY, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT,
Appellant
v.
SHERRI LEE HOLLIS,
Appellee
_________________________________
FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;
NO. 50,756-C; HON. PATRICK A. PIRTLE, PRESIDING _______________________________
Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Xcel Energy, by and through their attorneys, have filed a motion to
dismiss this appeal because they longer desire to prosecute it. Without passing on the
merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s
request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Brian Quinn Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McDonald Scott Hollis and Xcel Energy Third Party Defendent v. Sherri Lee Hollis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-scott-hollis-and-xcel-energy-third-party--texapp-2003.